Miliband urged to become greenest opposition ever

Ed Miliband has been congratulated for his comments on environmental issues at a party conference question and answer session this week. Following criticism for not mentioning environmental issues in last week’s central speech he has gone some way to appeasing those critics with this question and answer session at the party conference.

During the session in Manchester this week, Mr. Miliband said that the environment was “absolutely central” to his vision for the future and he criticised the government for their dwindling green credentials. He went on to say “George Osborne tells you that you can either have a good environment or you can have a good economy, absolutely wrong, you need both,” he said.

Friends of the Earth’s policy and campaigns director Craig Bennett said: “We’re delighted Ed Miliband has found his green voice – a One Nation approach must recognise that we only have one planet.”

“Labour must now become the greenest Opposition ever and challenge the Chancellor’s reckless dash for gas. Ed Balls should wake up and realise that this is where Osborne is weak and full of hot air. He must take on the anti-green Chancellor and his fossil-fueled economic strategy that simply doesn’t add up.”

Recipro sourced this article from Edie

Key issues raised regarding Waste Management sector

According to two major trade associations CIWM and ESA, the Government has a wide range of things they need to address if they hope for waste management to work in the UK; this includes more detailed planning system, getting the finance in place, recognising the potential for energy generation and providing a clear policy framework for the future are among a number of other issues.

CIWM and ESA have both published a list at they feel are priorities and as was expected they both came out with very similar views.

landfill-landscape

A clear vision on the future of waste management is seen as pivotal for the business to have the confidence it so desperately needs to invest in the sector and a revised planning system to make delivering critical infrastructure a more realistic proposition.

They both agree that the Government needed to realise the potential value of waste as an energy source. The two were also in agreement about finance being of key importance

That’s were there common ground came to end. ESA called for ‘a floor under landfill tax rates to as a long term driver to encourage investment’ and a streamlined procurement process to cut costs for contractors and councils.

CIWM took a more direct approach, saying there was a need for ‘meaningful investment support for new and greener technologies’.

The ESA flagged up three other priority areas – clear incentives for recycling and recovery; improvements in health & safety regulation and ensuring that European directives affecting the industry are transcribed onto the UK’s law books in a timely fashion.

CIWM said it wanted to see ‘clear, strategic objectives that marry together energy, material resources, low carbon and climate change imperatives’ and a greater commitment to enforcement and combating environmental crime.

Recipro is hoping that the issues that both of these companies have risen, will help convince the Government not to allow the problems to continue and instead come up with a solution so that the UK waste management systems can meet the environmental targets as well as realising the potential value of waste. Here at Recipro we recognise that one man’s waste can be of value to others.

Recipro Finds a Blind Spot

Working for Recipro gives me the opportunity to read up on every day environmental issues. I recently came across a very interesting article regarding the effect that glasses and contact lenses have on the environment.

Apparently this came in to focus during the big 3D cinema hype that has had the world drooling over the next incredible step forward in watching television. The film ‘Avatar’ created a demand for 42 million pairs of 3D glasses to be produced. The grand scheme to help counter the inevitable waste guaranteed to be left was to collect and reuse where it is possible, as I’m sure many people will have taken them home, and either lose or break them or simply put them in the bin (and probably not a recycle bin).

That isn’t the only waste caused by visual impairment; disposable contact lenses obviously have a clear environmental fault. It also doesn’t help that they arrive in sanitized blister packs and come with plastic bottles of solution. Single use lenses may not have the same size ecological effect as long term lenses, but still have an effect all the same.

So as it stands glasses are seen as the environmentally conscious person’s choice of sight enhancement. The problem with glasses is the frame, the heavily laminated acetates which is made from non renewable oils, which causes the creation of them to be highly damaging to the environment.

The opticians clearly don’t see this as a problem as ‘BOGOF’ offers are often the lead for their campaigns. A current pair of glasses is expected to last on average 2.2 years. So next time when you go to pick up your new spectacles why not ask for eco frames which contain recycled acetate, and show that you’re not short sighted when it comes to the environment.

Recipro investigates the oil rig explosion in the Gulf of Mexico

Following the huge explosion and sinking of an oil rig in the Gulf of Mexico there are a number of severe, ongoing environmental issues. After the still burning rig sank on the 22nd, two days after the explosion, a 600 mile wide area of crude oil began to appear 36 miles off the Louisiana coast. 5000ft under water a well is releasing a staggering 191,000 litres of crude oil into the ocean on a daily basis; the implications of this are overwhelming and it is vital that something is done to rectify the problem as soon as possible. Plans are underway to plummet unmanned robots into the ocean with which it will be possible to activate the ‘blow out preventer’, which would shut off the well. The process would take between 24 and 36 hours to complete and even then there is no guarantee they will be successful.

In the case of failure further plans have been drawn out to drill a number of relief wells to permanently secure the well, however this will take several months to complete during which time a specialised heavy fluid will be injected to stop the flow of oil or gas and allow the relief wells to be drilled.

Since the explosion on the 20th of April there are still eleven workers missing, who are presumed to have been killed in the disaster which left seventeen others injured. It is because of both the tragic loss of life, which leaves eleven families blind to the fate of their loved ones, and the huge negative impact on the environment which is still happening, which makes this one of America’s worst offshore catastrophes in the last forty years. The biggest worry for the future is the effect the oil will have on the land if or when it reaches it.

There is some good news, well, good news for those who own the environmentally damaging company; they have announced a 135% improvement in their profits in the first 3 months of 2010 they announced profits of $5.2 bn which has risen from 2.4bn a year ago. I’m sure this will serve as a bitter tonic for the families of those who died to increase the profits of a heartless company.

Former Shell CEO Jeroen van der Veer has said several times, the era of “easy oil” is over. It makes you wonder how far we are willing to go to gain oil. How much of the environment will we destroy in order to find this precious substance? How many lives will be lost due to these accidents?

Recipro look at the EcoVillage in Pembrokeshire

I’m sure that many of the Eco-Warriors out there have been following news of the eco-villages popping up in the world.  I for one find it fascinating to watch how plans become reality when it comes to sustainable living.  It is important to recognise the environmental issues and problems caused by existing dwellings and try to overcome these in eco-friendly ways.  However it is also important to develop the way new buildings are constructed.  Recipro promote the reuse of building materials and this in itself is one big step toward a more sustainable future, but what else can be done?  I have been following the progression of the Lammas project in Pembrokeshire and am excited that this month sees the first tours of the project.  The site will be open for viewing to local people on the 5th of May and 6th June and to any others on 8th of May and 5th June. 

There are currently seven families working on their plots on the Lammas project, you can read their bios and interests in sustainable living on the official website.  Each family has their own plans to lead a sustainable and self sufficient life in Pembrokeshire providing much of their own food and products whilst also selling their stock and produce to the local community.  These plans stretch from selling willow products grown on their land to selling cured meats at local farmers markets.  The families will each be working in jobs they love and feel passionate about whilst also living in a sustainable and beautiful environment, how many people in the big cities can say that? 

All of the houses are designed using low-impact architecture which uses a combination of recycled and natural materials.  The different dwellings will use diverse building styles including straw bale, earth sheltered, timber frame and cob and each will blend into the local landscape.  The Ecovillage will be separated from mains services meaning they will have to source their own electricity and water, something that has already been planned.  Using renewables the inhabitants of the village will be provided with electricity and there is an existing spring for drinking water, additionally there is a water turbine system already on the site and this is going to be restored and renovated, all this alongside rainwater harvesting on the roofs of buildings will mean the village will have plenty of water!  Compost toilets, wormeries and compost heaps will be used to compost all organic waste and finally, elephant grass and coppiced willow grown on site will act as fuel for those living in this sustainable village. 

I think it’s great that more “eco-villages” are being planned and on some occasions, developed and I both hope and look forward to seeing more in the future.  The village in Pembrokeshire is set to be an idyllic and eco-friendly place for the dedicated families who are developing their land there and, once completed, will hopefully persuade more people to follow their example and start looking to similar buildings for their own homes.

PWC have dealt with the environmental issues of office blocks with a new building awarded ‘Outstanding’ by BREEAM

Top Accountancy firm PricewaterhouseCoopers have received the first ‘outstanding’ environmental rating for their new office building in London.  During the construction of their new building PWC recognised the environmental issues and problems of both new and existing buildings and decided to build their office with the aspiration of reducing their carbon footprint.  A partner at PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, Roger Reeves said, “We had the opportunity with the design process for the building, to take a blank sheet of paper and raise the bar, both for ourselves and others, in the environmental and sustainability performance of office buildings.  This assessment sends a really clear message that planning for the sustainable use of resources, in detail and right through the process can make good business sense.”  And raise the bar they have, in order to achieve the BREEAM ‘Outstanding rating’ PWC have worked with design consultancy, BDP to meet a difficult score of 85% against strict rating categories in which they had to evaluate pollution, land use, transport, materials and other criteria.  80% of the aggregates within the concrete used were recycled, furthermore the majority of aggregates used in the build were also recycled, both a sustainable and cost efficient strategy. 

During the initial planning stages Bob Spittle, chairman of environmental engineering at BDP says that they were originally aiming for the “BREEAM ‘Excellent’ rating, however during the fit out design we could see the opportunity to lead and innovate, and we set ourselves the target to secure the BREEAM ‘Outstanding’ rating.  You have for to be determined to set and achieve these new standards; involve people early on and make sure the support of your developer, contractors and design team matches the vision of your clients.”  Their decision and motivation to see their plans through to the end have now set a standard for office buildings of the future.  The Recipro team would like to think that future projects to build offices will look to PWC’s accomplishment for inspiration.  Projects such as these could definitely benefit from the services Recipro provide because they could not only use recycled products but also reuse builders materials.  Whilst the shell of the building is now complete it is currently being internally fitted with all that an office of this scale needs.  Once completed in early 2011 the building will provide 5500 people with a place to work, will feature four restaurants, 240 cycle spaces, a roof terrace and onsite energy generation facilities using recycled cooking oil and the use of solar thermal panels.

A Burning Issue

urns-for-ashes

Today something entirely different and I’m afraid not really Recipro related. I saw a rather disturbing report in The Guardian regarding how to reduce my carbon footprint once dead! Should I really be concerned how much carbon is expended whilst they dispose of my body?

It transpires that cremation creates a large carbon footprint, whilst burial is equally damaging to the environment and is also too space consuming. Again I am still not sure that this is something that will concern many including myself, after all the carbon footprint of the dead is always going to be less than even the most eco minded living person.

However, one man has devoted his life to providing a low carbon solution to death. Scottish biochemist Sandy Sullivan has undertaken research in order to provide a solution which achieves what cremation can without the high carbon and mercury emissions, it is called Resomation.

He has developed a pressurised chamber which accelerates body decomposition as it would be in nature, the body is placed in the chamber with an alkaline solution which when heated will leave human remains as white ash within 3 hours. He claims that the method reduces the carbon footprint by four times that of cremation and even more disturbingly suggests that medical parts such as false hips will be left in pristine reusable condition. I think I will leave going to the doctors about that sore hip now.

Surely this is a step too far on ethical living….or dying as it is? I think I will leave it down to friends and family to decide my fate once dead, whether they choose burial, cremation or resomation is fine by me.

‘Climategate’

According to the BBC news website. Science has been damaged by the recent ‘Climategate’ accusations. Do you still trust our scientific advisor’s? We’d love to hear your thoughts about this and any other Environmental issues you feel strongly about.

Science damaged by climate row says NAS chief Cicerone By Victoria Gill Science reporter, BBC News,20 Feb 2010

Leading scientists say that the recent controversies surrounding climate research have damaged the image of science as a whole.

President of the US National Academy of Sciences, Ralph Cicerone, said scandals including the “climategate” e-mail row had eroded public trust in scientists. His comment came at the annual American Association for the Advancement of Science meeting in San Diego. Dr Cicerone joined other renowned scientists on a panel at the event.

‘Distrust has spread’

He said that the controversial e-mail exchanges about climate change data had caused people to suspect that scientists “oppressed free speech”.

His fellow panel members, including Lord Martin Rees, president of the UK’s Royal Society, agreed that scientists needed to be more open about their findings.

“There is some evidence that the distrust has spread,” Dr Cicerone told BBC News. “There is a feeling that scientists are suppressing dissent, stifling their competitors through conspiracies.”

Recent polls, including one carried out by the BBC, have suggested that climate scepticism is on the rise. Dr Cicerone linked this shift in public feeling to the hacked e-mails and to recently publicised mistakes made by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) in one of its key reports.

‘More transparency’

He said he was convinced that these events had had a wider knock-on effect. “Public opinion polls are showing that the answers to questions like: ‘how much do you respect scientists?’ or ‘are they behaving in disinterested ways?’, have deteriorated in the last few months.” He said that this crisis of public confidence should be a wake-up call for researchers, and that the world had now “entered an era in which people expected more transparency”. “People expect us to do things more in the public light and we just have to get used to that,” he said. “Just as science itself improves and self-corrects, I think our processes have to improve and self-correct.”

news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/8525879.stm

Plight of the Primate

A little different than the usual stuff on Recipro but an important issue that has arisen from man made influences on the environment.
20060616094545_primates42_44bf7d6e6abb2e5878299289e31208aa

 I was saddened today to read a report in the Guardian concerning the plight of the worlds primates. The report complied by a coalition of conservation groups and  primatolgists has stated that nearly half of all primate species face imminent risk of exticntion. Species such as the Orang Utan (above left) and the Golden Headed Langur (above right) have dwindled in numbers leaving these species under a very real threat of dissapearence.

The Golden Headed Langur could be down to as few as 60 individuals, simiraly species of Lemur and Gibbons have also been reported to be as low as 100 remaining individuals. In total there are 634 primate species, of which 48% are categorised by the IUCN as “red list” species. These are the species which are under greatest threat as the impacts of logging, hunting and smuggling take there toll upon them.

So how have humans allowed and initiated the decline of some of our closest living relatives? All over the world we have seen widespread deforestation and the destruction of primate habitat, often these areas have suffered as countries have struggled for economic growth, leading to the clearance of these lands for increased levels of agriculture. Pressures have also come from hunters and smugglers, for example in China primate hearts have been used in traditional medicines.
 
Due to the very low numbers  of individuals within certain species the threat of extinction is now very high for some primates, an event such as a cyclone or an outbreak of disease could spell the end for an entire species. With such fragile populations, the ease at which these species could fail is increasing, any disaster or event such as the above could have massive ramifications and the loss of these species forever.

_39928170_monkey300

So what is being done to save these primates? Deforestation is a key element to any deal to tackle climate change, not only in saving these fantastic animals but also due to the importance of rainforest areas in locking in carbon and preventing more greenhouse gases from entering the environment. Plans for developed countries to give money to developing countries to maintain their areas of forest and take action against illegal logging. In terms of the conservation of primate species conservation work is been undertaken by  a number of zoos and scientists to try to bolster the numbers of these animals. A list of the top 25 list has also been documented in order to create greater public awareness and also to try to encourage governments to become more active in conservation measures.

It seems so deeply saddening that the human race has nearly driven so many of its closest relatives to near extinction. It seems strange how this situation has been allowed to reach such dramatic levels with nearly 50% of all primate species as endangered. Surely the plight of primates has, at least to some extent, been known for a considerable length of time, even if the full extent was unknown. The real situation is however if there is no action now it will be too late and these creatures will become little more than a lifeless image in a book for future generations.

Again, not our usual subject of discussion, but I hope you enjoyed reading, please let us at Recipro know if you have any comments.

Attitudes towards travel and transport

As anybody who’s watched the television adverts about climate change knows travel, transport and in-particular car ownership are hot topics.

Recipro are continuing to post about the current Defra report on attitudes to environmental issues. As part of the survey, respondents were presented with three statements about travel and transport. Respondents were asked how strongly they agreed or disagreed with each of these. The findings are summarised in Figure 12 and Table 33.

Agreement with statements related to travel and transport

About half (49%) agreed that they would only travel on a bus if they had no choice with 21% strongly agreeing with this. Just over one third (37%) disagreed with the statement.

Nearly half (44%) of respondents agreed that ‘people who fly should bear the cost of the environmental damage that air travel causes’, with less than one third (27%) disagreeing with this.

In contrast, over half (55%) of respondents disagreed with the statement “for the sake of the environment car users should pay higher taxes” (including just over one quarter, 28%, who strongly disagreed).

Attitudes to travel and transport - comparisons between 2007 & 2009

The results from the current survey are broadly consistent with those from the 2007 Defra survey, with a small increase in the proportion of respondents who agreed that ‘I would only travel by bus if I had no other choice’ (up by 3%).